First Class Showdown: Emirates vs Singapore vs Etihad – Which A380 Suite Is Worth Your Money?

The Three-Way Battle

Emirates, Singapore Airlines, and Etihad all operate A380s with world-class first class products. But which one deserves your money (or miles)? We break down every detail.

If you’re planning an ultra-luxury flight and can’t decide between the big three Middle Eastern/Asian carriers, you’re not alone. These three airlines have been competing for “world’s best first class” for over a decade.

Here’s the definitive comparison.

The Quick Comparison

Feature Emirates A380 Singapore Suites Etihad Apartment
Suite Size ~35 sq ft 50 sq ft 39 sq ft
Shower Onboard Yes (2 shared) No Yes (shared)
Double Bed Option No Yes No*
Onboard Bar/Lounge Yes No Yes
Chauffeur Service Yes (complimentary) Limited Yes (complimentary)
US Routes Multiple cities None (A380) JFK, ORD
Award Availability Good Limited Moderate

*Etihad Residence has double bed but is a separate $25K+ product

Emirates A380 First Class

Best For: The Complete Experience

Pros:

  • Onboard shower spa (the viral feature)
  • Onboard lounge/bar for socializing
  • Complimentary chauffeur to/from airport
  • Extensive US route network
  • Best award availability through Alaska Miles

Cons:

  • Suites lack floor-to-ceiling doors (less privacy)
  • Smaller suite size than competitors
  • Product is from 2008 (refreshed, but aging)
Bottom Line: Emirates wins on amenities and accessibility. The shower, lounge, chauffeur, and network make it the most complete package.

Singapore Airlines Suites

Best For: Space & Service

Pros:

  • Largest first class suites (50 sq ft each)
  • Only true double bed option in the sky
  • Separate bed and seat (not convertible)
  • Legendary Singapore service
  • “Book the Cook” meal pre-selection

Cons:

  • No onboard shower
  • No onboard bar/lounge
  • No A380 routes to the US
  • Limited award availability
Bottom Line: Singapore wins on space and service. Best for couples wanting a double bed or anyone prioritizing suite size over amenities.

Etihad First Class Apartment

Best For: Privacy & Exclusivity

Pros:

  • Fully enclosed suite with closing door
  • Onboard shower
  • Onboard lounge
  • Premium chauffeur service
  • Direct US routes (JFK, ORD)

Cons:

  • Limited A380 fleet (only 10 aircraft)
  • Route network smaller than Emirates
  • Higher prices, less award availability
Bottom Line: Etihad wins on privacy with fully enclosed apartments. Smaller network but US routes available.

Price Comparison

Sample Route Emirates Singapore Etihad
To London (cash) $8-15K $8-15K $8-15K
To London (points) 100K Alaska 120K KrisFlyer 104K AAdvantage

The Verdict: Which Should You Choose?

Choose Emirates If:

  • You want the shower experience
  • You value the onboard bar/lounge
  • You’re flying from the US
  • You’re booking with points (best availability)
Choose Singapore If:

  • You’re traveling as a couple (double bed)
  • Space is your top priority
  • You value exceptional service above all
  • You’re already routing through Singapore
Choose Etihad If:

  • Complete privacy matters most
  • You want both shower AND enclosed suite
  • You’re flying JFK/ORD to Abu Dhabi
  • You want fewer passengers (smaller cabin)

My Personal Ranking

  1. Emirates A380 – Best overall for amenities and accessibility
  2. Singapore Suites – Best for couples and space seekers
  3. Etihad Apartment – Best for privacy and exclusivity

All three are exceptional. You genuinely can’t go wrong. The “best” choice depends entirely on what matters most to you.

Jason Michael

Jason Michael

Author & Expert

Jason covers aviation business topics including aircraft ownership, operating costs, and commercial aviation experiences. With a background in aviation operations, he researches and reports on airline premium cabins, travel value optimization, and the economics of flying. His articles synthesize industry data and traveler experiences to help readers make informed decisions.

50 Articles
View All Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *